The Navy Evaluation Form, officially known as the Evaluation Report & Counseling Record (E1 - E6), serves as a critical tool for assessing the performance and potential of enlisted personnel in the Navy. This form captures essential information about a sailor's achievements, duties, and overall contributions to their command, facilitating both personal development and career advancement. For those looking to fill out this important document, click the button below to get started.
The Navy Evaluation form, officially known as the Evaluation Report & Counseling Record (E1 - E6), serves as a critical tool for assessing the performance and potential of enlisted personnel. This comprehensive document includes essential details such as the service member's name, rate, and social security number, along with their unit identification code (UIC) and promotion status. It outlines the occasion for the report, whether it is periodic, concurrent, or special, and specifies the reporting period. The form evaluates various performance traits, ranging from professional knowledge and quality of work to military bearing and leadership capabilities. Each trait is rated on a scale from 1.0 to 5.0, allowing for nuanced feedback on the individual's performance. Additionally, the form includes sections for comments on performance, qualifications, and achievements, providing a well-rounded view of the service member's contributions during the reporting period. Ultimately, the Navy Evaluation form not only facilitates personal growth through constructive feedback but also plays a significant role in promotion decisions and career advancement within the Navy.
EVALUATION REPORT & COUNSELING RECORD (E1 - E6)
Save Form
RCS BUPERS 1610-1
Clear Form
1. Name
(Last, First MI Suffix)
2. Rate
3.
Desig
4.
SSN
5.
ACT
FTS
INACT
AT/ADSW/265
6. UIC
7. Ship/Station
8. Promotion Status
9. Date Reported
Occasion for Report
Detachment
Promotion /
Period of Report
10.
Periodic
11.
of Individual
12. Frocking
13. Special
14.
From:
15.
To:
16.
Not Observed
Type of Report
20.
Physical Readiness
21.
Billet Subcategory (if any)
Report
17. Regular
18. Concurrent
22.
Reporting Senior
(Last, FI
MI)
23. Grade
24. Desig
25. Title
26. UIC
27.
28.Command employment and command achievements
29.Primary/Collateral/Watchstanding duties. (Enter Primary duty abbreviation in box.)
For Mid-term Counseling Use. (When completing EVAL Enter 30 and 31 from counseling worksheet sign 32.)
30. Date Counseled
31. Counselor
32.Signature of Individual Counseled
PERFORMANCE TRAITS: 1.0 – Below standards / not progressing or UNSAT in any one standard; 2.0 – Does not yet meet all 3.0 standards;
3.0 – Meets all 3.0
standards; 4.0 – Exceeds most 3.0 standards; 5.0 – Meets overall criteria and most of the specific standards for 5.0. Standards are not all inclusive.
PERFORMANCE
1.0*
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
Pro-
Above
TRAITS
Below Standards
Meets Standards
Greatly Exceeds Standards
gressing
Standards
33.
- Marginal knowledge of rating, specialty
- Strong working knowledge of rating, specialty
- Recognized expert, sought out by all for
PROFESSIONAL
or job.
and job.
technical knowledge.
KNOWLEDGE:
- Unable to apply knowledge to solve
- Reliably applies knowledge to
- Uses knowledge to solve complex
Technical knowledge
routine problems.
accomplish tasks.
technical problems.
- Fails to meet advancement/PQS
- Meets advancement/PQS requirements on time.
- Meets advancement/PQS requirements
and practical application.
requirements.
early/with distinction.
NOB
34.
- Needs excessive supervision.
- Needs little supervision.
- Needs no supervision.
QUALITY OF WORK:
- Product frequently needs rework.
- Produces quality work.
- Always produces exceptional work.
Standard of work;
- Wasteful of resources.
Few errors and resulting rework.
No rework required.
- Uses resources efficiently.
- Maximizes resources.
value of end product.
35.
- Actions counter to Navy's retention/
- Positive leadership supports Navy's increased
- Measurably contributes to Navy's increased
COMMAND OR
reenlistment goals.
retention goals. Active in decreasing attrition.
retention and reduced attrition objectives.
ORGANIZATIONAL
- Uninvolved with mentoring or
- Actions adequately encourage/support
- Proactive leader/exemplary mentor.
CLIMATE/EQUAL
professional development of subordinates.
subordinates' personal/professional growth.
Involved in subordinates' personal
OPPORTUNITY:
- Actions counter to good order and
- Demonstrates appreciation for contributions of
development leading to professional growth/
Contributing to growth
discipline and negatively affect Command/
Navy personnel. Positive influence on
sustained commitment.
and development,
Organizational climate.
Command climate.
- Initiates support programs for military,
human worth,
- Demonstrates exclusionary behavior.
- Values differences as strengths.
civilian, and families to achieve exceptional
community.
Fails to value differences from
Fosters atmosphere of acceptance/
Command and Organizational climate.
cultural diversity.
inclusion per EO/EEO policy.
- The model of achievement.
Develops unit cohesion by valuing differences
as strengths.
36.
- Consistently unsatisfactory appearance.
- Excellent personal appearance.
- Exemplary personal appearance.
MILITARY BEARING/ - Poor self-control; conduct resulting in
- Excellent conduct, conscientiously complies
- Model of conduct, on and off duty.
CHARACTER:
disciplinary action.
with regulations.
- A leader in physical readiness.
Appearance, conduct,
- Unable to meet one or more
- Complies with physical readiness program.
- Exemplifies Navy Core Values:
physical fitness,
physical readiness standards.
- Always lives up to Navy Core Values:
HONOR, COURAGE, COMMITMENT.
adherence to
- Fails to live up to one or more
Navy Core Values.
Navy Core Values:
37.
- Needs prodding to attain qualification or
- Productive and motivated.
- Energetic self-starter. Completes tasks or
PERSONAL JOB
finish job.
Completes tasks and qualifications fully and
qualifications early, far better than expected.
ACCOMPLISHMENT/
- Prioritizes poorly.
on time.
- Plans/prioritizes wisely and with
INITIATIVE:
- Avoids responsibility.
- Plans/prioritizes effectively.
exceptional foresight.
Responsibility,
- Reliable, dependable,
- Seeks extra responsibility and takes on the
willingly accepts responsibility.
hardest jobs.
quantity of work.
NAVPERS 1616/26 (08-10)
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY-PRIVACY ACT SENSITIVE.
EVALUATION REPORT & COUNSELING RECORD (E1 - E6 ) (cont'd) RCS BUPERS 1610-1
1. Name (Last, First MI Suffix)
3. Desig
4. SSN
38.
- Creates conflict,
- Reinforces others' efforts,
- Team builder,
TEAMWORK:
unwilling to work with others,
meets commitments to team.
inspires cooperation and progress.
Contributions to
puts self above team.
- Understands goals,
- Focuses goals and techniques for teams.
- Fails to understand team goals or
employs good teamwork techniques.
- The best at accepting and offering
team building and
teamwork techniques.
- Accepts and offers team direction.
team direction.
team results.
- Does not take direction well.
39.
- Neglects growth/development or welfare
- Effectively stimulates growth/development in
- Inspiring motivator and trainer, subordinates
LEADERSHIP:
of subordinates.
subordinates.
reach highest level of growth and development.
Organizing, motivating
- Fails to organize, creates problems
- Organizes successfully, implementing
- Superb organizer, great foresight, develops
for subordinates.
process improvements and efficiencies.
and developing others
- Does not set or achieve goals relevant to
- Sets/achieves useful, realistic goals
- Leadership achievements dramatically further
to accomplish goals.
command mission and vision.
that support command mission.
- Lacks ability to cope with or
- Performs well in stressful situations.
- Perseveres through the toughest challenges
tolerate stress.
- Clear, timely communicator.
and inspires others.
- Inadequate communicator.
- Ensures safety of personnel and equipment.
- Exceptional communicator.
- Tolerates hazards or unsafe practices.
- Makes subordinates safety-conscious,
maintains top safety record.
- Constantly improves the personal and
professional lives of others.
40. Individual Trait Average.
41. I recommend this individual for (maximum of two): Assignment in Rating,
42. Signature of Rater (Typed Name & Rate): I have evaluated this member against
Total of trait scores divided by
Sea Special Programs, Shore Special Programs, Commissioning Programs,
the above performance standards and have forwarded written explanation of marks
number of graded traits.
Special Warfare Programs, Rating Instructor Duty, Other. (Be specific.)
of 1.0 and 5.0.
Date:
43. COMMENTS ON PERFORMANCE. *All 1.0 marks, three 2.0 marks, and 2.0 marks in Block 37 must be specifically substantiated in comments. Comments must be verifiable.
Font
Font must be 10 or 12 pitch (10 to 12 point) only. Use upper and lower case.
10
44. QUALIFICATIONS/ACHIEVEMENTS - Education, awards, community involvement, etc., during this period.
Promotion
Significant
Progressing
Promotable
Must
Early
47. Retention :
Recommendation
Problems
Promote
Not Recommended
Recommended
45.
48. Reporting Senior Address
INDIVIDUAL
46.
SUMMARY
49. Signature of Senior Rater (Typed Name & Grade/Rate): I have reviewed the evaluation of this
50.
Signature of Reporting Senior
member against these performance standards and have provided written explanation to support
marks of 1.0 and 5.0.
Summary Group Average:
51. Signature of individual evaluated. “I have seen this report, been apprised of my
52. Typed name, grade, command, UIC, and signature of Regular Reporting Senior on Concurrent Report
performance, and understand my right to make a statement.”
I intend to submit a statement
do not intend to submit a statement
Filling out the Navy Evaluation form is a crucial process that requires attention to detail and accuracy. This form serves as a record of an individual's performance and is used for evaluations, counseling, and recommendations. To ensure that the form is completed correctly, follow these steps carefully.
Once all sections are completed, review the form for accuracy and ensure that all necessary signatures are in place before submission. Properly filling out this evaluation form can significantly impact an individual's career progression and recognition within the Navy.
The Navy Evaluation form, also known as the Evaluation Report & Counseling Record (E1 - E6), is designed to assess the performance and potential of enlisted personnel. It serves several key purposes:
Performance is evaluated using a scoring system that ranges from 1.0 to 5.0. Each score reflects different levels of performance:
Each performance trait is rated individually, and specific comments are required for lower scores to provide context and justification.
The comments section is crucial for providing clarity on the performance ratings. Here’s what to keep in mind:
The evaluation can significantly influence a service member's career trajectory. It is used for:
In short, a strong evaluation can open doors to new opportunities, while a weak one may hinder career progression.
Incomplete Personal Information: Failing to fill out all required personal details, such as name, rate, or SSN, can lead to delays in processing the evaluation. Every piece of information is crucial for identification and record-keeping.
Incorrect Reporting Period: Entering the wrong dates for the reporting period can result in confusion and misrepresentation of performance. Always double-check these dates to ensure accuracy.
Neglecting Performance Traits: Omitting performance traits or providing vague descriptions can weaken the evaluation. Each trait should be addressed clearly, with specific examples of achievements or areas needing improvement.
Inconsistent Scoring: Using scores that do not align with the comments provided can raise red flags. Ensure that the scores accurately reflect the performance detailed in the comments section.
Failure to Substantiate Low Scores: If low scores are given (1.0 or 2.0), specific examples must be included to substantiate these ratings. Lack of evidence can lead to disputes and challenges.
Ignoring Counseling Dates: Not including the date of counseling or the counselor’s name can undermine the evaluation process. This information is essential for tracking progress and accountability.
Neglecting Signature Requirements: Failing to sign the evaluation or obtain necessary signatures from raters can invalidate the form. Signatures confirm that all parties are aware of and agree with the evaluation content.
The Navy Evaluation form is a critical document used to assess the performance of personnel within the Navy. However, several other forms and documents often accompany this evaluation to provide a comprehensive view of an individual's service and contributions. Below is a list of these documents, each described briefly for clarity.
Each of these documents plays an essential role in painting a complete picture of a service member's performance and potential. Together, they support informed decision-making regarding evaluations, promotions, and professional development within the Navy.
The Navy Evaluation form shares similarities with the Officer Evaluation Report (OER) used by the Army. Both documents assess an individual’s performance and potential for advancement. The OER includes sections for personal information, performance traits, and overall evaluation. Just like the Navy form, the OER emphasizes specific competencies and achievements, requiring evaluators to provide detailed comments to substantiate ratings. This ensures a comprehensive overview of the officer's contributions and areas for improvement, promoting accountability and transparency in the evaluation process.
Another document comparable to the Navy Evaluation form is the Fitness Report (FITREP) used by the Marine Corps. The FITREP evaluates a Marine’s performance in a similar manner, focusing on their duties, leadership abilities, and professional development. Both forms utilize a rating scale to quantify performance and require evaluators to provide qualitative comments. This structured approach helps in identifying strengths and weaknesses, guiding career progression and professional growth for Marines and Sailors alike.
The Performance Appraisal form used in civilian federal employment also resembles the Navy Evaluation form. This document assesses an employee's job performance and includes sections for specific achievements, competencies, and areas for improvement. Both forms aim to provide a clear picture of an individual’s contributions to their organization. The Performance Appraisal form, like the Navy Evaluation, encourages constructive feedback and sets the stage for future development, ensuring that employees understand their performance relative to established standards.
Lastly, the Annual Performance Review (APR) commonly used in private sector employment aligns closely with the Navy Evaluation form. The APR evaluates an employee’s performance over the year, focusing on goals achieved, skills demonstrated, and areas needing improvement. Both documents require specific examples to support ratings and emphasize the importance of setting measurable objectives. This parallel helps foster a culture of continuous improvement and accountability, ensuring that individuals are aware of their performance and potential for growth within their respective organizations.
When filling out the Navy Evaluation form, attention to detail is crucial. Here are five important dos and don’ts to keep in mind:
Misconception 1: The Navy Evaluation form is only for performance reviews.
This form serves multiple purposes, including documenting counseling sessions and tracking professional development. It's not limited to just performance evaluation; it also supports personnel growth.
Misconception 2: A high score on the evaluation guarantees promotion.
While a strong evaluation score is beneficial, it does not guarantee promotion. Other factors, such as available positions and overall command needs, also play a significant role in promotion decisions.
Misconception 3: Evaluations are solely based on individual performance.
Team dynamics and contributions to the command's mission are also considered. Evaluators look for how individuals work within teams and support overall objectives.
Misconception 4: Comments in the evaluation are optional.
Comments are essential, especially for low or high scores. Evaluators must provide specific, verifiable comments to substantiate any marks of 1.0 or 5.0, ensuring transparency and fairness.
Misconception 5: The evaluation process is a one-time event.
Evaluations are part of an ongoing process. Regular counseling sessions and mid-term evaluations are crucial for continuous feedback, allowing personnel to understand their progress and areas for improvement.
Filling out the Navy Evaluation form accurately is crucial for reflecting an individual's performance and potential. Here are some key takeaways to consider: