The California Laciv 198 form serves as an affidavit of identity and order, allowing judgment creditors to add new names or aliases for existing judgment debtors. This form is crucial for ensuring accurate identification in legal proceedings, as it helps clarify the identity of individuals involved in a judgment. To complete your legal process, fill out the form by clicking the button below.
The California Laciv 198 form is an essential document for anyone involved in a judgment collection process. It serves as an affidavit of identity and order, allowing judgment creditors to formally identify and add additional names or aliases of a judgment debtor. This is particularly important for creditors who may know the debtor by different names, ensuring that all relevant identifiers are recognized in legal proceedings. The form requires specific information, including the names of both the creditor and debtor, as well as any alternative names the debtor may be known by. Importantly, it is crucial to note that this form cannot be used to add new judgment debtors; it strictly pertains to existing ones. The declaration included in the form must be signed under penalty of perjury, affirming the truthfulness of the information provided. Once completed, the court will review the affidavit, and if approved, the additional names will be officially recognized in any related legal documents, such as writs of execution or abstracts of judgment. This process is vital for ensuring that creditors can effectively pursue the collection of debts owed to them.
NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY:
STATE BAR NUMBER
Reserved for Clerk’s File Stamp
TELEPHONE NUMBER (Optional)
ATTORNEY FOR (Name):
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
COURTHOUSE ADDRESS:
PLAINTIFF:
DEFENDANT:
CASE NUMBER:
AFFIDAVIT OF IDENTITY AND ORDER
I am the judgment creditor in the above entitled action.
1.The name of the judgment debtor as stated in the judgment is:
2.List additional name or names by which the judgment debtor is known:
3.The facts relied on in obtaining the judgment debtor’s additional name or names are:
This document may be used to add new names or aliases for present judgment debtors, but it may not be used to add new judgment debtors.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Date:
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)
(SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the identification of the judgment debtor shall include the names(s) stated in item #2 above, and those names may be added to any writ of execution or abstract of judgment.
JUDICIAL OFFICER
LASC LACIV 198 (Rev. 08/18) For Optional Use
Code Civ. Proc., §§ 680.135, 699.510 (c)(1)
Completing the California Laciv 198 form is a straightforward process that requires careful attention to detail. This form is necessary for updating the identity of a judgment debtor in a legal case. By following the steps outlined below, you can ensure that all required information is accurately provided.
Once you have completed the form, review it for any errors or omissions. After ensuring that all information is correct, you can file it with the appropriate court. This will initiate the process of officially updating the judgment debtor's identity in your case.
The California Laciv 198 form is a legal document used in the Superior Court of California, specifically in Los Angeles County. It serves as an affidavit of identity and order. This form allows a judgment creditor to add additional names or aliases of a judgment debtor to the court records. It is important to note that this form cannot be used to add new judgment debtors; it is strictly for updating information about existing ones.
The Laciv 198 form should be filled out by the judgment creditor, the person or entity that has won a judgment against a debtor. This individual or organization must provide their name, address, and contact information, as well as details about the judgment debtor, including any additional names or aliases they may be known by.
When completing the Laciv 198 form, the following information is required:
Additionally, the judgment creditor must sign the form, declaring that the information provided is true and correct under penalty of perjury.
Once the Laciv 198 form is submitted to the court, a judicial officer will review it. If approved, the additional names or aliases will be officially added to the court records. This means they can be included in any writ of execution or abstract of judgment related to the case. It is essential to ensure that the form is filled out accurately to avoid delays.
Typically, there is no filing fee associated with submitting the Laciv 198 form. However, it is always advisable to check with the specific court where you are filing, as fees can vary based on local rules and regulations. Being informed about any potential costs can help you avoid unexpected expenses.
No, the Laciv 198 form can only be used for existing judgment debtors. It is specifically designed to update information regarding those debtors by adding additional names or aliases. If you need to pursue a new judgment debtor, a different legal process must be followed.
Failing to provide complete contact information for the attorney or party without an attorney. This includes omitting the telephone number or State Bar number, which can lead to delays in processing.
Not clearly stating the name of the judgment debtor as it appears in the judgment. Inaccuracies here can cause confusion and may affect the enforcement of the judgment.
Listing additional names or aliases without providing the necessary context or facts that support these names. This could result in the court rejecting the request.
Neglecting to include the facts relied on to obtain the additional names. It is essential to provide this information to substantiate the claim.
Using the form to add new judgment debtors instead of just additional names for existing debtors. This form is specifically designed for the latter, and misusing it can lead to legal complications.
Not signing the form or failing to include the date of signing. An unsigned form is not valid and will be rejected by the court.
Forgetting to print or type the name of the declarant clearly. If the name is illegible, it may cause issues with identification and processing.
Overlooking the requirement to submit the form to the correct court address. Submitting to the wrong location can lead to unnecessary delays.
Not keeping a copy of the completed form for personal records. This is important for tracking the submission and having a reference for future actions.
The California Laciv 198 form is a crucial document in the process of identifying judgment debtors. Alongside this form, several other documents are often utilized to facilitate various legal proceedings. Below is a list of related forms and documents commonly used in conjunction with the Laciv 198 form.
Understanding these documents and their purposes is essential for anyone involved in the legal process surrounding judgments in California. Each form plays a specific role in ensuring that the rights of both creditors and debtors are respected and upheld in accordance with the law.
The California Laciv 198 form, known as the Affidavit of Identity and Order, serves a specific purpose in the legal landscape. It allows a judgment creditor to identify a judgment debtor by their additional names or aliases. This form is similar to the Affidavit of Identity used in various contexts where an individual’s identity needs to be confirmed. For instance, in cases of fraud or mistaken identity, an Affidavit of Identity can clarify which person is involved in a legal matter. Both documents require a declaration under penalty of perjury, ensuring that the information provided is truthful and accurate.
Another document that shares similarities with the Laciv 198 form is the Petition for Name Change. This legal document allows individuals to request a change of their name through the court system. Like the Laciv 198, the name change petition must provide sufficient details about the individual’s identity and reasons for the name change. Both documents emphasize the importance of clarity and accuracy in identifying the individual involved, whether for enforcement of a judgment or for personal reasons.
The Declaration of Facts is another comparable document. It is often used in various legal proceedings to present factual information that supports a party’s claims or defenses. In both the Laciv 198 form and a Declaration of Facts, the individual must attest to the truthfulness of the statements made. This shared requirement underlines the necessity for honesty in legal documents, as any falsehood can lead to serious consequences.
The Notice of Motion is also similar in that it serves as a formal request to the court for a specific action. While the Laciv 198 form focuses on identifying a judgment debtor, a Notice of Motion can be used to request a variety of court orders. Both documents must be properly filed and served to the relevant parties, ensuring that everyone involved is informed of the proceedings.
The Request for Judicial Notice is another document that holds similarities with the Laciv 198 form. This request allows a party to ask the court to recognize certain facts or documents as true without requiring further proof. In both cases, the parties must provide sufficient information to support their claims. This highlights the importance of establishing a clear and accurate representation of facts in legal proceedings.
Additionally, the Subpoena Duces Tecum is relevant here. This document compels a person to produce documents or records for a legal proceeding. While it does not focus on identity like the Laciv 198 form, both documents aim to gather crucial information that can affect the outcome of a case. They both require adherence to specific legal standards to ensure the information provided is reliable and relevant.
The Statement of Damages is another document that bears resemblance to the Laciv 198 form. This statement outlines the damages a plaintiff claims to have suffered in a lawsuit. Similar to the Laciv 198, it requires detailed information to substantiate the claims made. Both documents play vital roles in ensuring that the court has the necessary information to make informed decisions.
Lastly, the Application for Default Judgment can be compared to the Laciv 198 form. This application is filed when a defendant fails to respond to a lawsuit, allowing the plaintiff to seek a judgment without the defendant's presence. Both documents require accurate information about the parties involved and aim to facilitate the court's understanding of the case. They underscore the importance of proper documentation in achieving justice.
When filling out the California Laciv 198 form, it is essential to follow certain guidelines to ensure accuracy and compliance. Below is a list of things to do and avoid during this process.
Understanding the California Laciv 198 form can be tricky, especially with the many misconceptions that surround it. Here are ten common myths, along with clarifications to help you navigate this important document.
By clearing up these misconceptions, you can approach the California Laciv 198 form with confidence. Understanding its purpose and limitations is key to effectively managing your legal matters.
Here are the key takeaways about filling out and using the California Laciv 198 form: